Sentencing continues to be Continued.....Julie Amero....Will it ever end?

Print the article

This entry was posted on 4/24/2007 1:24 PM and is filed under Security Awareness,Internet.

I hope that you have been following this case through other vehicles.  Simply stated, my activities relative to Julie, college and clients has me going in overdrive and now that Spring has arrived, finally in New England, I have a lot of outside duties to tend to as well.  A lot has transpired since my last post, the most significant of which is the delay of the sentencing.  First of all in February until March 26th at the request of defense with the addition of skilled defense/appeal attornies and then March until April 26th at the State's request.  Now, April until May 18th and you may see it here first.

I determined the rescheduling to May 18th by calling
the GA-21 Criminal Clerks office in Norwich Superior Court this morning at about 11:30PM EDST.  I was told by the media it was not official yet and I suspect that is why none of the media seem to have picked this up yet.  None-the-less, I was told the following, "The Julie Amero sentencing hearing has been rescheduled for May 18th in Norwich Superior Court."  Thus, I have no reason to doubt its accuracy.

Now, why another rescheduling?  I could be barking up the wrong tree, and this would not be the first time, but with all of the media resources, international, national and local tied up with the Skakel trial in Bridgeport I believe that the State wants a clear agenda when the Julie Amero sentencing hearing takes place.  It is embarrassed and needs maximum publicity as it tries to extracate itself from the mess that it finds itself in.  For those that have not followed the case closely, the muck smears even Connecticut's Chief States Attorney Kevin Kane.  On the job for less than a year, I am quite sure he wants a job for awhile longer.

Keep your eyes and ears posted here.  If you want every detail, this is not the place to look.  However, if you only want the significant events in this case, you can be assured I will update you later.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 4/27/2007 10:15 PM mark wrote:
      Thanks for the update! We'll keep the pressure on.
      Reply to this
    • 5/29/2007 10:07 AM Morganor wrote:
      thank you for the update. I work in technical support, and I can attest that the story about people not understanding that their computers will not work if there is no electricity is true. There are a lot of people out there who just simply haven't a clue how a computer works. The reasons are many: they don't have the aptitude, (fair enough, I can't do car maintenance either) They are afraid of them, or they just don't want to know. None of the above, as far as I know is a criminal offense - yet. Julie Amero was railroaded by ignorance and paranoia for which there is no excuse. While I live in a country that is nowhere near as litigious as the USA, I hope she sues all concerned in this travesty into the ground.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.