Ok, she has been granted a new trial...so what's the fuss about.  After all, we all know that she was caught in a porn pop-up storm likely induced by others; how can she be at risk?  Simply stated, she was, and still is charged with 4 counts of "risk of injury to a minor".  The State still has the option of trying her again without using the digital forensic evidence and asking the jury whether she did enough to protect the children (7th graders) from the porn pop-up storm, whatever the cause.

There is enough about this case on the Internet to keep you busy for days reading it all and likely finding it all to be much alike.  If you would like a slightly different perspective, check out CCCure.Org.   If you prefer a more sanitized version, check out (ISC)²®.  These two will lead you elsewhere to accurate details of the Julie Amero case.

As things progress, hopefully all favorable, I will continue to post regarding Julie but hope to be able to put this case to bed real soon.  In the meantime, some of my peers and I will endeavor to correct those factors that allowed this to happen in the first place.  Wish us luck.

 

What did you think of this article?

Liked
Disliked
No Opinion